The Spokane River is so badly polluted that it will take $500 million and a decade to get a handle on the pollution problem. That's the upshot of a new plan released by the Washington Department of Ecology.
Nine years in the making, the plan envisions trading of pollution credits, much like the cap-and-trade legislation being considered in Congress to slow global warming. The public has until Oct. 15 to comment on the new plan.
According to a story in the Spokane Spokesman-Review by Becky Kramer, enviros and government types are happy about the plan. The most memorable writing about the Spokane River's pollution problems in recent memory came from Kim Murphy of the Los Angeles Times:
Come the post-dinner hour, however, Marcotte begins operating in the shadowy world of smuggled soap.
Local officials, you see, banned detergents containing phosphorus, the element that is leading to rapid growth of algae that ultimately robs the water of oxygen.
But most detergents still contain phosphorus. When residents of Spokane couldn't get their dishes clean enough using the reformulated soaps, they went across the state line to buy the good stuff. Good for them and their dishes, anyway -- but not so good for the Spokane River.
The story you just read is only possible because readers like you support our mission to uncover truths that matter. If you value this reporting, help us continue producing high-impact investigations that drive real-world change. Your donation today ensures we can keep asking tough questions and bringing critical issues to light. Join us — because fearless, independent journalism depends on you!
Despite concerns newsroom staffers shared with InvestigateWest and RANGE, the nonprofit taking over Spokane’s daily paper plans to keep Curley in a leadership role
Get the inside scoop in your inbox, free.
Subscribe to our weekly newsletters and never miss an investigation.
