Oregon county recommends 34,000 acres for urban growth

Republishing Guidelines

Yes, unless otherwise noted, you’re welcome to republish InvestigateWest’s original articles and photographs for free, as long as you follow a few simple conditions:

  • You must credit both the author and InvestigateWest in the byline. We prefer: “Author Name, InvestigateWest.”
  • You have to include the tagline provided at the end of the article, which typically reads, “InvestigateWest (investigatewest.org) is an independent news nonprofit dedicated to investigative journalism in the Pacific Northwest. Visit investigatewest.org/newsletters to sign up for weekly updates.”
  • You can write your own headlines as long as they accurately reflect the story.
  • You may not edit our work except to reflect your own editorial style or to update time references (changing “yesterday” to “last week,” for instance).
  • You may use InvestigateWest artwork (photos, illustrations, etc.) ONLY if you publish them alongside the stories with which they originally appeared and do not alter them. You may not separate multimedia elements for standalone use.
  • If you share our stories on social media, we’d appreciate it if you tag us in your posts.

Keep in mind: InvestigateWest sometimes republishes articles from other news outlets and we have no authority to grant republication permission. These stories are identifiable by their bylines and other credits.

We send story alerts to editors at news outlets across the Northwest. Let us know if you want to be included on that list. Questions? Contact us at editors@investigatewest.org.

Copy this

After more than a year of debate, officials in Washington County in Oregon have suggested that 34,000 acres -- namely existing farmland and forests -- be designated for future development, reports Brad Schmidt of the Oregonian. The decision comes in lieu of uproar from some of the cities' agricultural communities,  who risk losing one-fifth of their farmlands, an issue InvestigateWest covered in August.

Oregon's unique land-use laws, which place invisible lines between the state's urban and rural populations, have long plagued city planners bracing for growth. Regional policy makers can expand the Urban Growth Boundaries (UBG) to accommodate a growing population, but the issue is frequently contested by ranchers and rural folks, especially in Washington County -- one the state's strongest agriculture regions.

Writes Christian Gaston in the Forest Grove News-Tribune:

On one side is the group of people who say keeping the UGB where it is will force new developments to be built more densely, avoiding urban sprawl. End goal: New York.
On the other side is a group of people who say expanding the UGB will make it cheaper to build new houses or industry. End goal: Los Angeles.

Ray Pitz of the Sherwood Gazette reported that the Washington County Farm Bureau berated the county for their designation process, even arguing that they had misread the state statute that allows them to expand UGB boundaries. The issue has been forwarded to the regional committee, who have until November to make their final recommendations.

Get the inside scoop in your inbox, free.

Subscribe to our weekly newsletters and never miss an investigation.

Great! You’ve successfully signed up.

Welcome back! You've successfully signed in.

You've successfully subscribed to InvestigateWest.

Success! Check your email for magic link to sign-in.

Success! Your billing info has been updated.

Your billing was not updated.