Some Washington judges aren’t ordering accused abusers to surrender guns. A new court ruling could change that.
Advocates hope a Court of Appeals decision will resolve constitutional concerns about a firearm surrender law
For the second day in a row, we have some really disturbing news coming out of the Far North regarding the pace at which climate change is hurtling forward. (The first was this Western Exposure post.)
Charles J. Hanley of the Associated Press reports that in Canada's Northwest Territories, the permafrost is melting and the Earth is burping out huge slugs of methane, one of the most potent of the greenhouse gases.
This methane has the potential to drive extremely rapid warming. It's known as a feedback loop: As more methane escapes, it traps more heat in the atmosphere, which in turn melts more permafrost, and so on.
It's not that the earth has never gotten as hot as it apparently is about to get -- there were once balmy beaches and tropical vegetation in Alaska, for instance.
But the pace at which this warming is occurring is giving scientists serious pause, Hanley reports:
In 2007, air monitors detected a rise in methane concentrations in the atmosphere, apparently from far northern sources. Russian researchers in Siberia expressed alarm, warning of a potential surge in the powerful greenhouse gas, additional warming of several degrees, and unpredictable consequences for Earth's climate.
The prospects are alarming enough thath Rajendra Pachauri, chairman of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, in July told fellow climate scientists they should examine what "abrupt, irreversible climate change" from thawing permafrost might mean.
We should note that not all climate scientists -- and by that we mean those publishing with some regularity in the peer-reviwed literature -- believe the melting permafrost will move as quickly as others fear.
Nevertheless, it seems like something we need to get a handle on fast -- at least enough to figure out whether the feedback loop has started to work yet, or not.
Hanley ends his piece by interviewing Canadian permafrost expert Chris Burn. Yes, that's really his name. Burn's take:
If we lost just 1 percent of the carbon in permafrost today, we'd be close to a year's contributions from industrial sources, I don't think policymakers have woken up to this. It's not in their risk assessments...
I think we are playing with fire.
The story you just read is only possible because readers like you support our mission to uncover truths that matter. If you value this reporting, help us continue producing high-impact investigations that drive real-world change. Your donation today ensures we can keep asking tough questions and bringing critical issues to light. Join us — because fearless, independent journalism depends on you!
— Jacob H. Fries, executive director
DonateCancel anytime.
Subscribe to our weekly newsletters and never miss an investigation.
Our work has inspired new state laws, exposed government failures and impacted local communities in powerful ways. These stories wouldn't be told without InvestigateWest, and we couldn't do it without our generous supporters.
Cancel anytime.