Did Nevada strong-arm Utah over Snake Valley deal?

Republishing Guidelines

Yes, unless otherwise noted, you’re welcome to republish InvestigateWest’s original articles and photographs for free, as long as you follow a few simple conditions:

  • You must credit both the author and InvestigateWest in the byline. We prefer: “Author Name, InvestigateWest.”
  • You have to include the tagline provided at the end of the article, which typically reads, “InvestigateWest (investigatewest.org) is an independent news nonprofit dedicated to investigative journalism in the Pacific Northwest. Visit investigatewest.org/newsletters to sign up for weekly updates.”
  • You can write your own headlines as long as they accurately reflect the story.
  • You may not edit our work except to reflect your own editorial style or to update time references (changing “yesterday” to “last week,” for instance).
  • You may use InvestigateWest artwork (photos, illustrations, etc.) ONLY if you publish them alongside the stories with which they originally appeared and do not alter them. You may not separate multimedia elements for standalone use.
  • If you share our stories on social media, we’d appreciate it if you tag us in your posts.

Keep in mind: InvestigateWest sometimes republishes articles from other news outlets and we have no authority to grant republication permission. These stories are identifiable by their bylines and other credits.

We send story alerts to editors at news outlets across the Northwest. Let us know if you want to be included on that list. Questions? Contact us at editors@investigatewest.org.

Copy this

Some long-hidden details of secret negotiations to divvy up water in the Snake Valley in Utah and send it to Las Vegas have emerged from documents requested by the Great Basin Water Network.  Patty Henetz of the Salt Lake Tribune details some of the documents that show Nevada negotiators threatened to fight to overturn a law that required both states to agree on a split, if Utah didn’t capitulate to a 50-50 demand.

Utah did, fearing that a change in the law could result in even less favorable terms. But the apparent flip-flop to support the 50-50 split has angered and worried environmentalists, ranchers and others in the area who say removing that much water from the aquifer will result in devastating, unintended environmental consequences, essentially creating a new dust bowl.

The documents help explain Utah’s apparent turnaround on the agreement, which it initially opposed. But there may be even more to the story.

The Salt Lake Tribune’s editorial board suggests this – “. . the elephant in the room, and the most likely explanation for Utah negotiators agreeing to the deal is the proposed Lake Powell Pipeline.”

Utah doesn’t want to rile the various parties, including Nevada, who have to agree on the Lake Powell deal, the board writes. “SNWA (Southern Nevada Water Authority) has threatened to make trouble for Utah if it doesn’t play ball on Snake Valley.”

It’s a good thing the Great Basin Water Network made its open records request. There has been little opportunity for the public to know what thinking went on behind the  Snake Valley negotiations.

Or how much bullying.

--Carol Smith

Get the inside scoop in your inbox, free.

Subscribe to our weekly newsletters and never miss an investigation.

Great! You’ve successfully signed up.

Welcome back! You've successfully signed in.

You've successfully subscribed to InvestigateWest.

Success! Check your email for magic link to sign-in.

Success! Your billing info has been updated.

Your billing was not updated.