Climate deal looks unlikely until late 2010 at least

Republishing Guidelines

Yes, unless otherwise noted, you’re welcome to republish InvestigateWest’s original articles and photographs for free, as long as you follow a few simple conditions:

  • You must credit both the author and InvestigateWest in the byline. We prefer: “Author Name, InvestigateWest.”
  • You have to include the tagline provided at the end of the article, which typically reads, “InvestigateWest (investigatewest.org) is an independent news nonprofit dedicated to investigative journalism in the Pacific Northwest. Visit investigatewest.org/newsletters to sign up for weekly updates.”
  • You can write your own headlines as long as they accurately reflect the story.
  • You may not edit our work except to reflect your own editorial style or to update time references (changing “yesterday” to “last week,” for instance).
  • You may use InvestigateWest artwork (photos, illustrations, etc.) ONLY if you publish them alongside the stories with which they originally appeared and do not alter them. You may not separate multimedia elements for standalone use.
  • If you share our stories on social media, we’d appreciate it if you tag us in your posts.

Keep in mind: InvestigateWest sometimes republishes articles from other news outlets and we have no authority to grant republication permission. These stories are identifiable by their bylines and other credits.

We send story alerts to editors at news outlets across the Northwest. Let us know if you want to be included on that list. Questions? Contact us at editors@investigatewest.org.

Copy this

Well, we hate to say we told you so, but ... we told you so.

Comes news today that the Obama administration is downplaying any remaining hope for a deal being struck at the global climate-change negotiations next month in Copenhagen.

"Inevitable failure" is the how grist.org's Brendan Demelle puts it in his just-posted look at what's happening at the talks going on this week in Barcelona to prep for Copenhagen.

It seems the rebellion of the developing countries yesterday, led by the African nations, had the intended effect of jolting the developed countries. (Interesting, too, that the Africans led this, considering how Africa seems to have ambitions similar to those of China, India, et. al.)

Europeans and the United States today are running furiously away from any thoughts that a binding pact might be reached, Demelle reports:

In reality, Europe and the rest of the developed world have had more than ample time over the past decade to develop a clear position. But when pressed on specifics now, just weeks before the world expects a concrete treaty, they are still flailing around like fish out of water.

Meanwhile, the Obama administration is just flat-out saying ain't gwyne be no deal in Copenhagen, according to a report by Suzanne Goldenberg and John Vidal for The Guardian:

The scaling back of US ambitions follows a growing international consensus that a binding legal agreement on global warming could not be reached at Copenhagen – now just 32 days away. The US shift resets expectations for what will be accomplished at Copenhagen, once billed by the UN as a last chance to avoid catastrophic global warming.

A nugget the Guardian uncovered is that Democratic Massachusetts Sen. John Kerry is meeting with South Carolina Republican Sen. Lindsey Graham and Connecticut independent Sen. Joe Lieberman to figure out how to bring along conservatives as they try to pass climate-change legislation. That would go a long way to at least create a measure of goodwill toward the United States in Copenhagen.

Kerry is also strategizing with Energy Secretary Stephen Chu and Interior Secretary Ken Salazar, who was himself a denizen of the Senate until not long ago.

As for what we told you so about: Last month we reported from the Society of Environmental Journalists annual conference, for grist.org, that Obama administration officials were saying in a veiled way what they came right out and confessed to the world today: No deal is possible in Copenhagen.

However, it's a little surprising that they're now saying it could well be late 2010 before a pact can be reached.

OK, so maybe we don't hate saying we told you so all that much after all. But it doesn't make us happy. We'd just as soon have been wrong on this one.

-- Robert McClure

Get the inside scoop in your inbox, free.

Subscribe to our weekly newsletters and never miss an investigation.

Great! You’ve successfully signed up.

Welcome back! You've successfully signed in.

You've successfully subscribed to InvestigateWest.

Success! Check your email for magic link to sign-in.

Success! Your billing info has been updated.

Your billing was not updated.