Abortion battle meets health care reform: Do you see red? Does someone want you to see red?

Republishing Guidelines

Yes, unless otherwise noted, you’re welcome to republish InvestigateWest’s original articles and photographs for free, as long as you follow a few simple conditions:

  • You must credit both the author and InvestigateWest in the byline. We prefer: “Author Name, InvestigateWest.”
  • You have to include the tagline provided at the end of the article, which typically reads, “InvestigateWest (investigatewest.org) is an independent news nonprofit dedicated to investigative journalism in the Pacific Northwest. Visit investigatewest.org/newsletters to sign up for weekly updates.”
  • You can write your own headlines as long as they accurately reflect the story.
  • You may not edit our work except to reflect your own editorial style or to update time references (changing “yesterday” to “last week,” for instance).
  • You may use InvestigateWest artwork (photos, illustrations, etc.) ONLY if you publish them alongside the stories with which they originally appeared and do not alter them. You may not separate multimedia elements for standalone use.
  • If you share our stories on social media, we’d appreciate it if you tag us in your posts.

Keep in mind: InvestigateWest sometimes republishes articles from other news outlets and we have no authority to grant republication permission. These stories are identifiable by their bylines and other credits.

We send story alerts to editors at news outlets across the Northwest. Let us know if you want to be included on that list. Questions? Contact us at editors@investigatewest.org.

Copy this

Just when talk of "death panels" was umm, dying down, now comes talk that funding for health care reform would pay for abortions. Not just abortions, but the fully loaded  'abortion on demand.'

Do you see red? Does someone want you to see red?

told the Denver Post

Not to miss a chance to hit the rhetorical red zone at the first opportunity.

Speaking of red, the National Right to Life Committee has gone "Condition Red" on its Web site.

Meanwhile, NARAL Pro-Choice America wants people to calm down and "Help us Stop the Lies!" Supporters note that none of the bills reference abortion, and accuse the opposition of "entangling" the issues to gain a nationwide abortion ban in the private health insurance market.

Abortion opponents say creation of a "public option," or government-run insurance plan, allows the plan's designers to cover all abortions, reports Michael Booth of the Post. Abortion-rights advocates say the bill , and especially an amendment added by Rep. Lois Capps, D-Calif., makes it clear that health reformers are not seeking to expand abortion funding. A report in Congressional Quarterly last week indicates that members of the Senate Finance Committee are focused on ensuring that abortions services will not be covered by federal funding.

President Obama has said the reproductive services will be covered by health care reform, just as they are by public and private health insurance plans now. Does seizing on this language now seem, oh, just  a tad manipulative? Like waiting until the "death panels" debate lost a couple of octaves, and then trotting out the next 'issue' surely designed to get the tried-and-true believers out en masse screaming and yelling, mad as hell and not gonna take it anymore?

How about health care on demand? How's that for fully loaded?

-- Rita Hibbard

Get the inside scoop in your inbox, free.

Subscribe to our weekly newsletters and never miss an investigation.

Great! You’ve successfully signed up.

Welcome back! You've successfully signed in.

You've successfully subscribed to InvestigateWest.

Success! Check your email for magic link to sign-in.

Success! Your billing info has been updated.

Your billing was not updated.