100-plus air toxics are killing us

Republishing Guidelines

Yes, unless otherwise noted, you’re welcome to republish InvestigateWest’s original articles and photographs for free, as long as you follow a few simple conditions:

  • You must credit both the author and InvestigateWest in the byline. We prefer: “Author Name, InvestigateWest.”
  • You have to include the tagline provided at the end of the article, which typically reads, “InvestigateWest (investigatewest.org) is an independent news nonprofit dedicated to investigative journalism in the Pacific Northwest. Visit investigatewest.org/newsletters to sign up for weekly updates.”
  • You can write your own headlines as long as they accurately reflect the story.
  • You may not edit our work except to reflect your own editorial style or to update time references (changing “yesterday” to “last week,” for instance).
  • You may use InvestigateWest artwork (photos, illustrations, etc.) ONLY if you publish them alongside the stories with which they originally appeared and do not alter them. You may not separate multimedia elements for standalone use.
  • If you share our stories on social media, we’d appreciate it if you tag us in your posts.

Keep in mind: InvestigateWest sometimes republishes articles from other news outlets and we have no authority to grant republication permission. These stories are identifiable by their bylines and other credits.

We send story alerts to editors at news outlets across the Northwest. Let us know if you want to be included on that list. Questions? Contact us at editors@investigatewest.org.

Copy this

smokestack-by-doe2

Air toxics are largely not subject to the kind of strict regulation that "traditional" air pollution like NOX, SOX and particulates are, and yet just the other day we begged off a longer discussion of the topic, opining that air toxics were a subject for another day.

Well, aren't we the lucky ones? Our friends at the Society of Environmental Journalists have just helpfully provided a guide to what's happening with the National Airborne Toxics Assessment. It's an eye-opener.

For example, it turns out there are something like 180 kinds of toxic gunk in the air that are killing us. Bear in mind that there are no ambient air standards for most of these. No lie.

NATA estimates risks for only about two-thirds of the air toxics.  Even considering that limited picture, they do plenty of harm. SEJ's staff has compiled a piercing summary of what NATA shows, including:

The results indicate that almost every person in the US lives in an area where the cancer risk exceeds 10 in 1 million after a lifetime of exposure to selected air toxics, well in excess of EPA’s general target of 1 in 1 million. For 2 million people, the risk is far worse, exceeding 100 in 1 million. The average risk is 36 in 1 million.

And:

For noncancer respiratory risks, nearly everyone in the country lives in an area where the hazard index was higher than EPA’s target of 1.0, and the index was 10 or higher for more than 22 million people.

Now, technically, SEJ's "tipsheets" are targeted at and indispensable for professional environmental reporters on the beat. But, hey, this is a great example of why individual independent citizens who are concerned about what's happening around them might want to access these well-researched tips for reporters.  (Full disclosure:  I serve on the SEJ board of directors, my way of giving back for all SEJ has done for me.)

And, while we're at it, why can't these citizens help reporters do their jobs? Please let me know if you have ideas along these lines.

Get the inside scoop in your inbox, free.

Subscribe to our weekly newsletters and never miss an investigation.

Great! You’ve successfully signed up.

Welcome back! You've successfully signed in.

You've successfully subscribed to InvestigateWest.

Success! Check your email for magic link to sign-in.

Success! Your billing info has been updated.

Your billing was not updated.